Category Archives: Reviews

Review: Brats by Andrew McCarthy

 

Brats, June 2024, director, Andrew McCarthy, producers: Adrien Buttenhuis and Derrick Murray, film accessed via Hulu streaming service. Film is a documentary that uses primary sources such as film reels, television interviews, news articles, film clips, interviews from eyewitnesses who were involved with the “Brat Pack” of the 1980s. “Experts” are consulted as secondary sources to explain the 80s cultural phenomenon and the impact of “Brat Pack” films on the cultural zeitgeist. 

Thematically, Brats focuses on the films that transformed the cultural lexicon of the 1980s, the trade off of fame, and McCarthy’s personal mission to confront the past. 

The film was directed by Andrew McCarthy and it follows him in his journey to reconnect with his old castmates, contemporaries, and individuals who are “experts” about the impact of the “Brat Pack” films of the 1980s on popular culture. The conflict McCarthy hoped to confront and resolve with his film were the consequences associated with an article published on June 10th, 1985 in New York Magazine titled “Hollywood’s Brat Pack.” The article was written by journalist David Blum and he is credited with creating the famous phrase “Brat Pack” to identify a group of young actors in the early 1980s who starred as the leads in many feature films geared towards a younger audience. McCarthy makes it clear that he believed the article was “scathing” and damaging to himself and young actors of the day and their professional reputations. More than anyone would realize, the term “Brat Pack” lived on in the cultural zeitgeist to permanently identify the actors association with the “Brat Pack.” The phrase itself was created by a member of the media, David Blum. The overall media ran with it and the phrase snowballed into something that would impact actors like Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson, Rob Lowe, Andrew McCarthy, Molly Ringwald, Demi Moore, and Ally Sheedy for the rest of their lives. These actors would be forever known as part of the “Brat Pack” in popular memory, culture and history. McCarthy is ultimately critical of the article’s depiction of young actors and how the term “Brat Pack” impacted his life and personal relationships. He uses his disdain as motivation to contact members of the “Brat Pack” to then revisit their shared unwanted connection and to hopefully confront his past. 

The film’s historical accuracy is dependent on the testimonies of “Brat Pack” members, journalists like Malcolm Gladwell and Susannah Gora; pop culture critic, Ira Madison III; directors like Brett Easton Ellis and Howard Deutch; producer Lauren Shuler Donner, talent manager Loree Redkin, casting director Marcie Liroff and the infamous David Blum. We are meant to trust these testimonies that are then edited and interwoven with interview footage and photos that serve as evidence to how the actors felt in reaction to Blum’s article. Photographs and newspaper clippings from the 1980s were used as primary sources. Film clips from St. Elmos Fire, Pretty in Pink, Class, the Breakfast Club are used to depict the relationship between the actors who were interviewed and the roles they played. McCarthy also uses two quick cuts of words featured in Blum’s article. 

The film’s historical inaccuracies stem from McCarthy withholding David Blum’s article. McCarthy never shows the full article to the audience. He only shows snippets of sentences utilized by Blum to describe his perception on how easy it was for young actors to skip a proper theater arts education to achieve success. McCarthy also shows sentences critical of Emilio Estevez who is declared by Blum to be the “president” of the “Brat Pack.” A major inaccuracy arising from the article being withheld is that McCarthy gives the impression that many young actors were mentioned by name and were subsequently trashed by Blum. In reality, the main subjects of the article were Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson and Rob Lowe.  Demi Moore (who was interviewed as if she was mentioned) was only briefly mentioned as Estevez’s on and off girlfriend while Ally Sheedy (who was also interviewed as if she was mentioned), Molly Ringwald, and Jon Cryer (interviewed as if he was mentioned) were never identified as members of the “Brat Pack.” Blum identifies actors like Matt Dillon, Nic Cage, Tom Cruise, Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon, Matthew Broderick, and Matthew Modine. Like Demi Moore, Andrew McCarthy is briefly mentioned and it was not due to any criticism from Blum. It was due to criticism from Emilio Estevez who openly criticized McCarthy’s acting technique. McCarthy fails to be specific about how the article negatively depicts young actors as a whole. Blum wrote the article after spending time with Estevez, Nelson and Lowe in the New York Club scene. Blum recorded what he saw and heard while he was with the young actors. The content served as the basis for his article. 

The Moments:

Time 28:35 

The theme associated with the “Brat Packs” impact on the cultural lexicon is made most clear by McCarthy’s interview with Malcolm Gladwell. Although Gladwell is not a pop culture historian, he offers insight on how the “brat Pack” label caught fire. Gladwell explained that the “Brat Pack” label signified a generational transition in Hollywood that was an explicit reference to a pun on the famous “Rat Pack” with Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin and Sammy Davis Jr.. Gladwell explained that the reference itself became a metaphor. Specifically, Gladwell stated “Whenever a term makes that journey to metaphor status, it has a chance to kind of endure. And, you know, it’s also funny. The “Rat Pack” and the “Brat Pack” in sensibility are polar opposites, right? One is anxious, and immature, and trying really hard to figure out their place in the world and the other group doesn’t give a fuck.” Gladwell goes on to explain how the “Brat Pack” was such a cultural phenomenon with youth culture as younger audiences were unified by coming of age films. 

1:13:35

Another pivotal moment in the film is when McCarthy speaks to David Blum, the writer of the New York Magazine article that solidified the phrase “Brat Pack.” Blum explains how the term came to be and the context behind its creation. McCarthy first asks Blum about his employment as journalist in 1985 and the original purpose of the article. Blum clarified he was under contract with New York Magazine and the article was meant to be a feature on Emilio Estevez. Estevez invited Blum to have drinks along with Rob Lowe and Judd Nelson. Blum noted how much attention the actors were receiving. Blum explained he was mostly there to observe and did not dislike any of the actors or think of them as brats. Blum’s epiphany on the famous phrase “Brat Pack” came after he had a very big dinner with LA journalists. One of the journalists, Alan Richmond, took into account how much food Blum and other journalists ate as a result of the dinner, coining the phrase “Fat Pack.” Blum was very amused by it. The joke eventually re-emerged in Blum’s head as he was driving around LA, spinning it into the phrase, “Brat Pack” as the title of his article. Blum then began to draft out his ideas, recalling the events of the night he spent with Estevez, Lowe, and Nelson that fell into the actions of what a “brat” would do. Blum stated he did not perceive the phrase as that big a deal or as insulting but he did think the article would receive a reaction. 

Teaching and Learning:

I would use this film in the context of history education because it demonstrates how terms/phrases can be taken out of context and serve as products of their time. The term “Brat Pack” symbolizes a point in time in which there was a generational transition in Hollywood films that appealed to a unified youth culture. It also permanently impacted the personal lives of young actors from the 1980s. My students are tasked with textual analysis on a daily basis with historical documents and a lot of the time famous phrases are taken out of context and given a new meaning. I would first do an introductory activity that asks students to think about the trends that exist in popular culture such as the most popular sayings. I would make a list of them and then save them for later. If I had to introduce the film to students, I would play the first 12 minutes of the film in order to establish what popular culture was like in the 1980s and the definition of “Brat Pack.” I would then give them David Blum’s article. I would give them a list of questions associated with the content of Blum’s article. I would ask my students why the term “Brat Pack” could be perceived as a negative and/or positive. I would then ask my students to investigate the origins of the popular sayings they mentioned in the intro activity to learn about their cultural significance and their connotation. Students would then be given background information on all the people associated with the documentary. Students would then be shown the rest of the documentary. They would then be given a survey associated with how they felt about McCarthy’s documentary. The survey would feature questions like were the actor’s victims of David Blum’s article, was the term “Brat Pack” enough to damage an actor’s relationship? Once they answered the survey, I would then give them copies of David Blum’s article once again along with quotes from the actors featured in the documentary discussing his article. I would ask them to compare and note the contrasts in the article and the actors’ statements. Students would then be expected to answer a short answer question about whether or not the article was truly damaging to the reputation of the actors mentioned in the article and documentary. I would want my students to ask questions related to how popular phrases and terms can endure over time. 

History Pin Review

History Pin Review:

I used historypin.org to investigate pinned historical sites in my area. I was surprised to see that there were few pins posted for local historical markers.

I know there are plenty of more historical locations surrounding my place of living as well as my workplace so this must be something I can complete in the future. That said, the historical location I focused on was Christ Church, Port Tobacco Parish, La Plata, MD.

 

The pinner was the US National Archives and not a local from the area.

Historypin’s about information is transparent about its mission and its role in maintaining cultural history.

This demonstrates that historypin.org works in partnership with libraries, archives and museum groups although individuals can join the site in maintaining a digital history about their local communities. The information the US National Archives gives for Christ Church is brief and includes an image of the Church from 1941.

I feel like more information related to Christ Church can be better given by a local. For instance, historical markers are on the property-detailing the significance of the location.

The church is also open for church services and locals can go inside to take further photography related to the location and building’s architecture.

The history pin site attempts to use place-based techniques associated with how locations change over time by placing an old photo of Christ Church over a modern day photograph. Historypin’s theory is associated with continuities and changes over time. This is made evident by the transparency scroll tool the site has in order to allow site visitors to see the similiarities and differences of the location at different historical time periods.

Physical and Digital Site Comparative Review

The Old Town Jail of Leonardtown, Maryland:

More than one story is tied to Leonardtown, Maryland’s Old Jail Museum. The structure illustrates a “history of jailers, prisoners and its role in the Underground Railroad.” That being said, another historical narrative is also connected to the jailhouse. Well, it is more of a local legend “the life and legend of Moll Dyer the ‘St. Mary’s County witch.’”

A photo of the Old Jail in Leonardtown, Maryland

The Old Jail’s Structure:

The Old Jail is a building that was developed in 1876 to serve as the sixth iteration of the local county jail. The structure is 20 by 25 feet, two stories high and built of stone and brick. The structure’s original layout included two rooms on the first floor that were created for the jailer and their family while the three cells on the second floor were dedicated to holding the prisoners. The prisoners were segregated by gender and race with one cell for all Black prisoners. 

 

The Old Jail’s Layout:

Today, the Old Jail’s layout consists of two rooms on the first floor that serve as the Leonardtown Visitor Center/gift shop and one exhibit that showcases the building’s history. The second floor includes two exhibits that showcase the courthouse’s connection to the Underground Railroad Network to Freedom and the lynching of a Black man named Benjamin Hance. Hance was kidnapped from the 1876 jail and was lynched by a mob of white men on June 17, 1887. The building is located in the center of Leonardtown, sharing a plot of land with the current and functioning county courthouse. A historical marker commemorating the lynching of Benjamin Hance is located in front of the Old Jail.

 

 

Historical Marker dedicated to lynching victims.
Historical marker for Benjamin Hance

The brick path connected to the front entrance of the Old Jail also pays respect to the runaway slaves who were incarcerated at the Old Jail as the men’s names are engraved in the brick closest to the tree. However, rather than refer to them as runaway slaves in the brick they are referred to as “freedom seekers.”

The names of runaway slaves or in other words freedom seekers are engraved in the brick.

Who owns the Old Jail?

The building itself is owned by the St. Mary’s County government. In 2020, the St. Mary’s County Museum Division took control of the museum’s operations by updating the exhibits and adding the Leonardtown Visitor Center. The Old Jail shares land with the current county courthouse and is located behind historic downtown Leonardtown Square and near the St. Mary’s County Historical Society.

The St. Mary’s County Courthouse.

Leonardtown Square has its own history tied to Maryland’s provincial period as well as a WWI memorial dedicated to town residents. The Square also serves as a shopping center with specialty stores and restaurants. In relation to the St. Mary’s County Historical Society, the Old Jail was once used to house the records of the historical society. 

Who is the audience?

The primary audience of the Old Jail are tourists and/or visitors to Leonardtown. Although the building serves a purpose in exhibiting local history a good portion of the building caters to tourists. The Old Jail’s gift shop and visitor center are both used to advertise the town’s attractions, businesses and events. Awkwardly, the Old Jail also brings more than just tourists to its vicinity as it also shares a path with courthouse patrons. Although there is a parking lot behind the jail, the lot is mostly for courthouse employees and visitors. I believe visitors of the Old Jail are meant to walk rather than drive to the location from the town square due to the signage on the sidewalks. 

What items are used to communicate the interpretation?

The primary items used to communicate the interpretation of the Old Jail include a 1860s style ballot box, an exhibition of the building’s roof tiles, a brick fireplace, parchment showing wicken symbols, model bunk beds, a 1930s prisoner restraining device, chamber pot and African American art.

The roof tiles.

All of the items illustrate an aspect of history in association with St. Mary’s County and Leonardtown.  Information panels and markers are also used to present more information to visitors on all of the presented items. Many items are missing from the exhibits as the location is currently working to create new exhibitions in two of the rooms on the second floor. Glass cases will be used to show off these items once they are ready for the public.The space does not have interactive elements and provides a collection of reading materials. One interpreter resided in the space and was ready to answer any questions about the location while also carrying out the responsibilities of a gift shop clerk.

Information on the Jailers and the first female jailer in Maryland.

One of the most important aspects of the Old Jail is an exhibit showcasing the jar of soil that was collected during a Soil Collection Ceremony in 2019 to honor Benjamin Hance. The exhibit demonstrates how St. Mary’s County is working in partnership with the Equal Justice Initiative to memoralize lynching victims across the country. Another important aspect of the Old Jail is a timeline that demonstrates how the Old Jail has evolved overtime since its original iteration in 1660 to 2020. 

The soil collected in tribute to Benjamin Hance.
The Old Jail’s timeline.

The Weaknesses:

A weakness of the Old Jail is how it tries to connect itself to the “legend” of the town witch Moll Dyer who was in all honesty an herbalist. A window on the first floor attempts to connect to this legend by having parchment paper with wicken symbols and poems about witches laid in front of it. I would remove this from the exhibition and just allow the site interpreter to direct visitors to the St. Mary’s County Historical Society as that location has more relevant information on Moll Dyer. Another weakness of the Old Jail was the lack of physical items in the space. Objects demonstrating the Old Jail’s history should be more apparent in the exhibits that are currently a work in progress. 

 

The wicken symbols.
Direction to the Historical Society and the Moll Dyer Rock related to the Leonardtown “Witch” Moll Dyer.

The Digital Counterpart: 

The digital presence of the site is connected to the St. Mary’s County government’s recreation and park’s museum division. So, if one were to visit the St. Mary’s County of Maryland website the Old Jail would not be the main focal point of the site. In comparison, the Old Jail’s digital counterpart is meant to provide information on the Old Jail and Leonardtown Visitor Center’s hours of operation. The site provides an overview of the museum’s purpose and its connection to the Underground Railroad’s Network to Freedom. The historical argument presented at the physical site is consistent with what is presented digitally. But rather than go into depth about its historical interpretations, the site provides links to other sites that might provide more information to its visitors. For instance, the site provides a link to an article from the Equal Justice Initiative that discusses the placement of the Historical marker dedicated to Benjamin Hance. The site does not provide participatory or interactive elements except clickable links. The site creators cannot be reached unless you fill out an online form to provide information or feedback to the Recreation and Parks agency of St. Mary’s County. I would change the digital experience by providing more information on the Old Jail itself such as a photo gallery, a video tour and a video with a site interpreter. In doing so, the digital site can allow for more historical interpretation that separates itself from the tourist aspect of the Old Jail’s visitor center.

Market Research and American Business, 1935-1965 Database Review

Market Research & American Business, 1935-1965 Review

Market Research & American Business , 1935-1965 is a database that showcases original documents in the pursuit of knowledge related to the consumer boom of the mid-20th century.

Search

The site is researcher friendly as it provides a chronology, pop up glossary, an ad gallery and a “My Archive” feature. The chronology is related to mid-20th century consumerism, covering a timeline of 100 years. The site prides itself on its chronology tool even going so far as to state that its patrons can “view entries specific to a range of thematic categories, such as Inventions and Innovations, and Businesses and Brands.” The site also specifies that it is possible to search the database via keywords and then “create a printable list of the entries most relevant to your research.” The chronology tool provides its patrons with a list view option, histogram, navigation arrows, and filter options with category and timeline tabs. The pop up glossary allows users to define terms related to advertising, marketing, and market research. The ad gallery is a collection of advertising prints from the 1930s-1960s that can be filtered by Industry, Decade, Image Type, or Brand, and the companies. Researchers can also save their newly discovered resources in the “My Archive” feature of the site to revisit at a later time.

In regards to documents, they are filtered by type. Documents can be filtered as Letters, Memorandums, Pilot Studies, Proposals, Reports and Supporting Materials. All documents are assigned an industry in which they are associated. Industries are listed alphabetically and include Advertising, Electronics, Food and Drink and much more. Search directories are provided that enable keywords, companies and brands to be used in research. Original images can be viewed using the image viewing screen and by utilizing the magnification tools. The search engine “searches across all document-level metadata including bibliographic details, full text of printed material and selected additional editorial features.” The search engine can carry out a keyword search and a more advanced search. Further resources are also provided such as case studies, essays, and business biographies.

Date Range: 1935-1965

Publisher: Adam Matthew

Object Type: Documents and Images

Exportable Image: Yes

Facsimile Image: Yes

Full Text Searchable: Yes

History/Provenance:

The market research reports of Ernest Dichter, the most prominent consumer analyst and researcher of the time, are a pivotal part of the archive. Additionally, the database has collected an abundance of reports related to consumerism and the advertising industry of the historical time frame. Adam Matthew Digital Ltd is the publisher of the material while participating libraries include Hagley Museum and Library, Ernest Dichter and the Institute for Motivational Research, John W. Hartman Center for Sales, Advertising & Marketing History (Duke University), and the Advertising Archives.

Reviews:
“This file delivers amply on the vendor’s claim that it “provides a unique insight into the world of buying, selling, and advertising in pre- and post-war America.” It does more than that, with sometimes chilling psychosocial analysis that will successfully serve researchers in the areas of psychology, history, business, marketing, advertising, consumerism, gender studies, ethnic and minority studies, communications, sociology, American studies, philosophy, terrorism, and politics.” – Cheryl LaGuardia, Library Journal

“The vintage images match the aesthetic of the twentieth-century era. This database was visually enjoyable and informative for those who are interested in studying twentieth-century market trends, as well as some of the psychological motivations and behaviors of this era. The topics of reports range in product types and behaviors.”
-Anne Larrivee, Reference Reviews

Access: Requires an institutional login to access the database.

Info from Publisher: www.amdigital.co.uk

Other Info:
Images and documents can be downloaded as PDFs, printed, and photocopied. Additionally, digital items can be bookmarked and shared. That said, materials are restricted by copyright as long as items are not duplicated or used for profit but educational purposes. The site also states “none of the material may be published without first gaining permission from Adam Matthew and The Hagley Library.”

Citing:
According to Market Research and American Business, 1935-1965 database, scholars should follow the correct parameters for citation. Scholars should reference the document or image and the library holding the material. The copyright notice should be referenced. The bibliographic details of documents can be exported to RefWorks and EndNote.